The plaintiff is conflicted. The legal arguments appear tenuous. And, in places, the 35-page lawsuit that Elon Musk filed last week with the Superior Court of California against OpenAI reads like a mash-up between a science fiction film script and a letter from a jilted lover. But Musk’s submission that OpenAI has breached its founding charter and endangers humanity by prioritising profit over safety may still turn into the most substantial move yet to scrutinise the company’s attempts to develop artificial general intelligence.
原告內(nèi)心矛盾。法律論據(jù)顯得牽強(qiáng)。而且，埃隆?馬斯克(Elon Musk)上周在加州高等法院(Superior Court of California)提起的針對(duì)OpenAI的35頁起訴書的某些段落，看起來像是科幻電影劇本與被拋棄的情人的訴苦信的混合體。但馬斯克的基本主張——OpenAI將利潤置于安全之上，從而違反其創(chuàng)始章程，并危害人類——仍可能會(huì)成為監(jiān)督該公司開發(fā)通用人工智能(AGI)嘗試的迄今最為實(shí)質(zhì)性的舉措。