This essay was written in response to Gideon Rachman’s invitation to readers to sit his ‘2066 history exam’. Of 170 entries, the FT is publishing the best five (see panel for the others). This piece addresses the question: Why did the “end of history” only last for 20 years?
【編者按】本文是應(yīng)吉迪恩?拉赫曼(Gideon Rachman)邀請讀者參加其“2066年的歷史考試”而作。英國《金融時報》將從收到的170篇作品中選擇最優(yōu)秀的五篇刊發(fā)（FT中文網(wǎng)選擇其中三篇發(fā)表）。本篇答案回答的問題是：為什么“歷史的終結(jié)”只持續(xù)了20年？
您已閱讀5%（404字），剩余95%（7330字）包含更多重要信息，訂閱以繼續(xù)探索完整內(nèi)容，并享受更多專屬服務(wù)。